The Anti-islamic Revolution in Iran against the IRGC and what everyone from across the world can learn from it

     Since the end of last December from around the 27th when the protests started in Iran against the Ayatollah and the IRGC. The protests have grown significantly and it has now become a Revolution which has got the Ayatollah and IRGC scared to the point that he has openly admitted that he is willing to shed as much blood as required to retain power for the sake of Islam - which proves the kind of evil person and government that the world is dealing with. We must understand that the Ayatollah and IRGC are a terrorist outfit that trained the same men who attacked the twin towers in New York before they moved to the US to carry out the attacks. The Ayatollah and IRGC do not mince words about their intentions regarding the West and Christianity which the US represents as a country as well as their opposition to Israel and the Jews in general, the IRGC in fact, has also been funding Hamas, Hezbollah and other Palestinian Jihadi organisations with the money earned from drug cartels in Central and South America while it gets these cartels to send drugs to the US to destroy the lives of American citizens. This is precisely why the IRGC is evil and the reason why most Iranians are disconcerted with Islam, the fact that most Iranians have moved away from Islam over many years and have been converting to Christianity in countless numbers as well as to other religions to a lesser extent like Zoroastrianism as well as atheism. They know that these are worldviews that do not seek to control every aspect of their lives as citizens of Iran through systematic enforcement of religious and civil laws in the name of divine law called Shariat the way Islam does.

  From the start of this Revolution against the oppressive IRGC which began last December, we have been hearing and watching news about how the Ayatollah's regime has been cracking down on protesters, having killed more than 12,000 while actual estimates from people on the ground are reported to be far higher and this has only been increasing. The blood trail in this case goes up to the Ayatollah himself and the IRGC people working under him who are working overtime to suppress and quell the Revolution. The Ayatollah has also been clear in his statement that he will stop at nothing to ensure that Islamic republic continues to be in power even if it means shedding more blood which is precisely how dictatorships work around the world. In reality, the loved ones of the dead have to pay the regime money just to get back the bodies of their loved ones. Hence the Islamic regime of the mullahs in Iran under the Ayatollah and his IRGC are making blood money off of the dead and there have been reports of them killing even people who are not involved in the revolts since they are short of cash. The Ayatollah is also a rogue who issued a fatwa saying that Iranians who reject the pro-Islamic protests would be seen as enemies of Allah and as such would be put to death if caught by the IRGC. This is precisely how a Islamic theocratic dictatorship works. All dissent and rejection of values supposedly represented by Allah and his fake prophet Muhammad are viewed as criminal offences, regardless of whether the said protesters in Iran are even Muslims to begin with which is TRULY oppressive in every sense of the word. It is heartening to know that Trump responded to Shah Pahlvi's pleas for intervention in Iran in favour of the Iranians who are being massacred en masse by the Ayatollah and his criminal IRGC. 

i) Here is what Western Leftists can learn from the anti-Islamic Revolution in Iran: 

     A lot of Western Leftists delude themselves and seek to do the same to others by not just supporting the fake image of a peaceful Islam and supporting Muslim immigration to the West from Islamic countries, not even with any proper procedure or even vetting. Lebanon is an example of a Christian country that ended up being taken over by Shi'a Muslims from Iran under the Ayatollah's encouragement and the Christians as well as other non-Muslims there made the same mistake of allowing Muslims into Lebanon in large numbers. The end result was the Muslim take-over of Lebanon at a political level. Once that happened the hosts became captive and were subject to an overthrow of secular laws in favour of islamic Shariat laws where non-Muslims are seen as second-class citizens. Worse still, Hizbollah was formed and trained by the Al-Quds force of the Ayatollah's IRGC in power in Iran leading to Israel having to face another enemy to its Northern border aside from the PA  and later Hamas which again started receiving weapons and training from the Al-Quds force of the IRGC of Ayatollah in Iran. So the take-away from the above example is not to duped by Muslims when they tell them that Islam is about peace and also to realise that immigration from Islamic countries especially when it is unchecked and uncontrolled will be their undoing.

ii) Here is what Western Republicans should stand for besides opposing unchecked immigration to their countries:

     Iran is a very ancient country which has a very rich and vibrant culture spanning several millennia and is considered a part of the area near the Tigris and Euphrates rivers that is referred to as the cradle of civilisation. When Islam came, it was the mighty Sassanid empire that was in power and they never went down without a fight. The Arab onslaught via Islam did so much damage to Iran that the Farsi language lost its unique Pahlvi script which got replaced by an Arabic influenced script in use till date. Music, painting and the arts were suppressed as any form of artistic expression are considered Haram in orthodox Islamic belief. Much of the so-called "Golden age" of Islam which Muslims share with Westerners to gain converts to Islam was because of European slaves and Iranians whose former inventions and discoveries ended up getting relabelled as "Islamic innovations". As for star mapping and astronomy, these were already in use by the Nabateans of Petra prior to Islam's advent for long journeys as the Nabateans were already well-versed with the knowledge of stars and astronomy which later got transferred to the Arabs and hence cannot be attributed to Islam in any way. In the end, the Persians as a civilisation and a people had a language Farsi which is richer in literature than Arabic and all their arts got suppressed in Iran since Islam became the dominant religio-political system there. On average, Persians are smarter than Arabs. Even in the 20th century, the Iranian people were free till the Islamic Revolution of 1979 by the Shi'a Mullahs which repressed the people and severely punished any dissent or disagreement with the Shariat laws institutionalised by the Ayatollahs who have the power to issue Fatwas to kill anyone opposing their regime. For American Republicans, this means that if you remain silent and do not rush to the aid of the Iranians in this hour of need against the Ayatollah and the IRGC who are taking away their lives for opposing his repressive rule, then nobody will take your thoughts or words seriously that you side with freedom and Human rights.

iii) What to make of the reluctance of Gulf states to side with the US in a supposed strike against the IRGC in Iran:

    Gulf States like Qatar, Oman and Saudi Arabia supposedly played a role in dissuading Trump from pursuing his plans against the IRGC in support of the Iranian Revolutionaries. At first glance, the reason presented to the West by these countries is that if Iran is struck by the US, then their own oil fields and industries in their respective countries including American bases in those areas are at risk from Iranian missile strikes. This was presented as the reason even when the US evacuated most of its military personnel from its bases encircling Iran which seeks the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people which devout Muslims around the world who are even non-Arabs see as their enemy owing to their religious books and the vilification of Jews therein whereby any action taken against Jews is seen as godservice to Allah the Islamic god. The latter is the ideological reason for the existence of terrorist organisation like Hamas and Hizbollah despite the Sunni-Shi'a divide. This again teaches us that Sunnis and Shi'as despite their differences in beliefs have a mutual hatred towards the Jewish people which is primarily enshrined in the Islamic sources as a duty to Allah and Muhammad. This further explains why the Gulf Sunni states like Saudi, Qatar and Oman went to the extent of citing a secondary reason to dissuade the US from striking Iran because if the IRGC falls in Iran, that effectively signals the fall of Islam in Iran and the end of a major enemy of Israel and the Jewish people who are still seen as enemies of Islam in the Middle East and around the world.

iv) Are the IRGC's claims of stopping the massacre true? 

     When Trump told the Ayatollah and IRGC earlier that if they fail to stop killing their people, the US would consider military actions in support of the Revolutionaries. In response, some high-ranking IRGC spokespersons told Trump that it had stopped and that those awaiting death via hanging have been set free. What are we to make of these words in light of the IRGC's attempts to prevent informaion from leaking out from Iran from the Revolutionaries when even Elon's starlink system is being jammed by military-grade communication jamming systems over a large swathe of land in Iran to prevent information from leaking out of Iran?. If it is true that the killings have stopped, why would the IRGC resort to total Internet blackout across Iran in a bid to prevent the anti-IRGC Revolutionaries from sharing what is going on in their country from their side of reality?. Basically, the IRGC's Internet blackout means that they can go scot-free by lying through the skin of their teeth and creating a fake impression as if none of the anti-IRGC revolutionaries are killed in Iran anymore when truth be told, the reality is a far cry from the nonsensical lies spouted by the IRGC's spokespersons. We must bear in mind that even among Muslims, Shi'as are considered far less trustworthy than Sunnis because they tend to use "Taqquiah" which is not just permissible but prescribed in religious contexts but can also extend to the political sphere when Islam's influence is felt in politics in a country like Iran. The level of lying by these people is so rampant that even if they are subjected to lie-detector tests, their heart-rates, blood pressures and other physiological signs which would otherwise give away lying would be quite normal in these Shi'as (and Sunnis) where lying for religio-political reasons keeping Islam's advance in mind is encouraged since they are very young and hence is not seen or perceived by them as wrong or sinful.

 
v) Ayatollah's threats against Trump and Trump's counter-threat and what is means without action as expected by the Iranian people who are being killed en masse on the streets of Iranian cities:

    When Trump warned that if the IRGC did not get the act together, they would be attacked by the US. The failure of Trump to make good on that promise till date is actually perceived by the IRGC leaders as a weakness in resolve which sends off all kinds of negative signals to the IRGC's evil mullahs leading to the most recent taunts and threats against Trump by the Ayatollah. The US administration needs to realise that any hesitation or lack of resolve wherein words are not followed up with action is interpreted by evil Islamists like the IRGC's members as weakness and hence they feel that they are free to threaten and taunt Trump as they please and Trump's counter-threat is merely seen by them as a response in a war of words without action as if it is all talk and no trousers. Worse, if this continues without any military action by the US against the IRGC, the Revolutionists feel let down by the US Administration even as countless protesters are still being killed or face death in Iran for opposing the IRGC, so it is an encouragement to the IRGC's mullahs to fast track their suppression of the Revolutionaries by speeding up the killing process even as there is an Internet blackout in Iran.

    In the end, I hope that this counter-Revolution to the 1979 Islamic Revolution succeeds and the Shah returns to Iran with his plans to rebuild the country for the benefit of the Iranian people. To this end, I am sure that Iranians would be immensely grateful to Trump, if any military action is taken against the IRGC nodes and their cronies so that the Mullahs' rule in Iran would come to an end and that Iran would be restored to its former self where men, women and children are free to live life as they please in freedom without fear of being punished and harmed by the Mullahs who are destroying Iran because of their evil Islamic dogmas raised to the level of politics whereby they are harming people of various religious groups like Christians for gathering and praying together in churches or in houses. A return to a secular Iran is the need of the hour in the Middle East for better relations between Iran and Israel implying Israel would have 1 less Middle-Eastern enemy to worry about if the IRGC falls. Iranians want a secular Iran because they have had enough of Islam and Shariat, the only people who will have a problem with this are Iran's Sunni/Shia neighbours (aside from Israel of course) because that would mean 1 less Islamic country with a Shariat-based suppressive and repressive government where dissent from Mullah rulings are crushed with an iron-clad hand without the slightest bit of remorse as the Ayatollah himself has admitted that he is willing to go to level of bloodshed in Iran to ensure that Islam is in power which is just absolutely revealing of what kind of a sick lowlife Iranians are dealing with.